English Verb Tense Agreement
It is not always easy (or particularly useful) to try to distinguish perfect and/or progressive tensions from simple isolated ones, for example the difference between the simple progressive past (“You ate an apple”) and present perfectly progressive (“She ate an apple”). An isolated distinction of these sentences is possible, but the differences between these sentences are evident only in the context of other sentences, as the time differences proposed by different schedules are related to the period that is implied by the verbal tensions in the surrounding sentences or clauses. The verb chord in this sentence makes sense, because the cake must be made before it can be eaten. I eat the cake is a clause for itself; the word that signals a new clause, entirely with a subject (I) and a verb (made). If you are very attentive to the tense verb chord, you will find that your writing can be easily understood by your readers. However, in some cases, a natural succession of tensions is more appropriate. Here, the tension of a verb in a secondary clause is not determined by the tension of the verb in the upper clause, but simply according to the meaning of the clause that is taken from the rest of the sentence.  The rule for writers following the natural sequence of time can be expressed as follows: At the time of definition, imagine by the main verb and use tension for the subordinate verb that you would have used at the time.  Thus, the tension used in indirect discourse remains the same as in words, as originally pronounced.
This is normal if the main verb is in the present or future tension (unlike past tense or conditional mood). For example, as soon as you discover that this is a matter of consistency, you can immediately eliminate any selection of answers that is not in a simple past. Once the selection of responses is eliminated, the verb forms J. remain with “dignity” and “will” are less often tested in the ACT English Section, but they appear occasionally. For the ACT, just think of “using” in sentences with tense past verbs and “wants” in sentences with common verbs or future tense verbs. Time-based words and phrases as before, after, after time and others — when used to bind two or more actions in time — can be good indicators of the need for a perfectly-stretched verb in a sentence. If the actions in your sentence take place at different times, you need to change the tension using a subordinate clause.